On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 04:08:19PM +0200, Giulio Bottazzi wrote: > Hi, > I've got the suspicion I stumbled upon a possible bug... I think it should > be step(nan)=nan. The actual implementation > > [ ... ] >
Thanks Giulio, Indeed you're correct that this is bug. I fixed it, will roll out new release now. Regards, Alex
