2007/11/23, Jose Mena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It's a simple one-line melody, and I'd expect this to take no time > for LilyPond to compile. And in my Ubuntu 7.11 virtual machine, > it does indeed take no time. My test had the code compiling in about > 3.5 seconds. The astonishing thing is the difference in Windows > Vista. This short code clocked in at 45 seconds of compile time. > So, as I asked earlier: does anybody know what's going on here? It
Yes, the fontconfig cache doesn´t get written, or it gets written, but does not get read on the second call. It would be nice if someone could post the output of running it from the commandline in windows with FC_DEBUG=255 in the environment. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
