Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwenn <at> gmail.com> writes: > > 2007/11/23, Jose Mena <jmena <at> princeton.edu>: > > > It's a simple one-line melody, and I'd expect this to take no time > > for LilyPond to compile. And in my Ubuntu 7.11 virtual machine, > > it does indeed take no time. My test had the code compiling in about > > 3.5 seconds. The astonishing thing is the difference in Windows > > Vista. This short code clocked in at 45 seconds of compile time. > > So, as I asked earlier: does anybody know what's going on here? It > > Yes, the fontconfig cache doesn´t get written, or it gets written, but > does not get read on the second call. > > It would be nice if someone could post the output of running it from > the commandline in windows with FC_DEBUG=255 in the environment. >
So I'm pretty sure I made what you wanted, but since it's a ridiculously long text file (we're talking nearly 80k lines), I've uploaded it to MediaFire for whoever wants to download it and take a look at it. The url is this: http://www.mediafire.com/?6nmax9xl2vz. Thanks to anyone who decides to help me out, Jose Mena _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
