"Dmytro O. Redchuk" <brownian....@gmail.com> writes:

> On Wed 06 Oct 2010, 07:44 David Kastrup wrote:
>> Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes:
>> 
>> > On 10/5/10 5:50 PM, "Keith E OHara" <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> If \cadenzaOff turns autobeaming on, then what about scores that turn off
>> >> autobeaming for the whole piece, but then (mis-)use short cadenzas?
>> >
>> > The CHANGES file informs the user that they will need to turn off
>> > autobeaming manually after the cadenza, as does the notation reference.
>> >
>> > I think this is the right thing to do.
>> 
>> I think a revert would be more appropriate.
> Please, why?..

Not a revert of the commit.  A \revert to the setting before the cadenza.

-- 
David Kastrup

_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to