Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > On 4/22/21, 9:49 AM, "Bart Kummel" <b...@kummelweb.nl> wrote: > > I think you should re-consider this comment: "The other option is ditching > LilyPad and doing a Darwin-only version of LilyPond, assuming that we can > do this with suitably free components.", by David Kastrup. I don't think > many people are using the limited editor LilyPad. There are a lot of > better > tools available (Frescobaldi). I'd rather have a native LilyPond without > the *Pad, than having to compile it myself or rely on a Docker solution. > > This implies that the only reason we need Apple's SDK is for compiling > the LilyPad editor. Is that true?
I think there were also native font libraries involved but they might likely be replaced with more generic ones at some loss of versatility. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
