Jonas Hahnfeld <hah...@hahnjo.de> writes: > Am Donnerstag, dem 22.04.2021 um 18:03 +0000 schrieb Carl Sorensen: >> >> On 4/22/21, 9:49 AM, "Bart Kummel" <b...@kummelweb.nl> wrote: >> >> I think you should re-consider this comment: "The other option is >> ditching >> LilyPad and doing a Darwin-only version of LilyPond, assuming that we can >> do this with suitably free components.", by David Kastrup. I don't think >> many people are using the limited editor LilyPad. There are a >> lot of better >> tools available (Frescobaldi). I'd rather have a native LilyPond without >> the *Pad, than having to compile it myself or rely on a Docker solution. >> >> >> >> >> This implies that the only reason we need Apple's SDK is for >> compiling the LilyPad editor. Is that true? >> >> Is it possible to create a Mac app bundle without the SDK? >> > > No, my understanding of the problem is that you cannot *compile* for > macOS
Using the MacOS SDK. Other than that, Apple can go pound sand regarding what they want or not want to be done. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
