On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 00:00, Paul Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 03:52 -0500, Michael Witten wrote: >> > Thus, it makes most sense for `--dry-run' (`-n') to mask `--touch' (`-t') >> > rather than the other way around (which is the current, buggy, unexpected, >> > possibly ruinous behavior). > > This patch seems correct to me.
Is this discussions finished then? _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
