On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 17:14, Paul Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 18:49 -0500, Michael Witten wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 00:00, Paul Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 03:52 -0500, Michael Witten wrote: >> >> > Thus, it makes most sense for `--dry-run' (`-n') to mask `--touch' >> >> > (`-t') >> >> > rather than the other way around (which is the current, buggy, >> >> > unexpected, >> >> > possibly ruinous behavior). >> > >> > This patch seems correct to me. >> >> Is this discussions finished then? > > Yes, I will make this fix.
Are you still planning to commit my patch? Message-ID: <[email protected]> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-make/2011-03/msg00000.html _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
