Follow-up Comment #9, bug #58979 (project make):
[comment #8 comment #8:]
> > I've attached my makefiles.
>
> i guess, a clarification is needed.
>
> The attached makefiles are a part of a bigger system. The other part is
missing. It is not possible to reproduce the issue with the attached makefiles
for anyone who is missing the other part.
>
> Can you write the smallest possible makefile (or a set of makefiles), such
that even people who don't have your full build environment can run to
reproduce the issue?
I will try to do that.
>
>
> > Per your suggestion, I ran with '-n.' It revealed nothing interesting.
>
> Did it hang or not?
No. It did not hang.
I designed this build system many years ago. I believe we were running 3.80
at the time. I confess that I have spent very little/no time tracking changes
to GNU make. Mea culpa. I have adjusted for some of the breaking changes,
but I have never put '+' on any recipes. When is that needed?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58979>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
