Follow-up Comment #17, bug #63307 (project make):
> Speaking only for myself, the most realistic scenario I can think of where I
would encounter this myself is if I run 'make 2>&1 | less' and then quit less.
In that case I would not be interested in having any build continue, I would
just want to get back to my prompt
In this scenario the user quit less.
i was thinking about automated builds (jenkins, build farms, etc). Those build
systems get really messy with miriads of pieces of shell code. Should make
abort a build if one of those pipelines fail? My thinking was, if the failed
pipeline was supposed to produce something, then its failure will fail the
build anyway.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63307>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
