On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 02:15:00AM +0200, K.G. wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:56:04 +0200 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Andrew, Sven and me discussed this matter earlier and decided > > we should try Berlios so we can put things together > > (Savannah/FTP, Alioth/CVS, GNU/(WWW,ML)). > > Any objections? If not I'm going to register an account for > > Parted there. > > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 23:41:02 +0200 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:24:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > I have a questions about this, maybe i missed something earlier, but who > > > the > > > hell is berlios, and what do we gain by moving there instead of staying at > > > alioth ? > > So Sven wasn't really involved about berlios after all ... ?
Well, i have to say that i had hardly a free minute of time since start of august, i just wondered who is berlios though, since i kind of never heard of it. > > What are we going to do now? > > I guess we have to choose between 2 options and it's going to be easy : > either berlios has a clear advantage over alioth for us and we move, > or we just continue to use alioth but with SVN instead of CVS, and maybe > with other features alioth can offer. As Parted is a GNU project, maybe > WWW and releases have to stay on gnu.org anyway ? > savannah, alioth and berlios are basicaly the same thing so let's choose :) > (whow that's a third option indeed : put everything on savannah :P ) Yes. that owuld have been the logical thing, and what i was thinking about it. More to this later, Sven Luther _______________________________________________ Bug-parted mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
