On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 10:55:34AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 02:15:00AM +0200, K.G. wrote: > > > > So Sven wasn't really involved about berlios after all ... ? > Well, he was on vacation at this time, but he should have got the mails > about this afterwards. > > > I guess we have to choose between 2 options and it's going to be easy : > Most likely. > > > either berlios has a clear advantage over alioth for us and we move, > > or we just continue to use alioth but with SVN instead of CVS, and maybe > > with other features alioth can offer. As Parted is a GNU project, maybe > > WWW and releases have to stay on gnu.org anyway ? > > savannah, alioth and berlios are basicaly the same thing so let's choose :) > > (whow that's a third option indeed : put everything on savannah :P ) > I think Savannah does not have Subversion, and I cannot see it being offered > on Alioth either. Also, both are missing shell access.
svn.debian.org carries the parted subversion project where all the parted alioth members have access to. I currently use it for the debian packaging, but there is place for upstream there too :) Friendly, Sven Luther _______________________________________________ Bug-parted mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
