On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:53:11AM +0200, Peter Breitenlohner wrote: > On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Joel Granados wrote: > >> This should be primary not pirmary. >> Can you pls try again. >
Peter: Thx for your feedback. It is much appreciated. My comments bellow. > Hi Joel, > > did it again as root, in the parted build directory, and got: > echo n | ./parted ---pretend-input-tty testfile \ > "mklabel gpt mkpart primary ext3 1 -1" > Warning: The existing disk label on > /.th/thsrc/archive/gnu/parted/parted-1.9.0-build-linux-gnu/parted/testfile > will be destroyed and all data on this disk will be lost. Do you want to > continue? > /home/pcl321/peb/archive/gnu/parted/parted-1.9.0-build-linux-gnu/parted/.libs/lt-parted: > invalid token: mkpart > Yes/No? n you must regenerate the testfile once more. `dd if=.....` > > Note: /home/pcl321/peb/archive -> /.th/thsrc/archive > > The above was with parted-1.9.0; Untill now, there is no interest in maintaining a bug fix branch for 1.9.0. Especially for something that happens in a test, so I must insist you stop testing with 1.9.0. The next branch is very different from what we released and testing on 1.9.0 is just a wast of time IMO. Additionally, the next branch contains lots of bugfixes already, so you might be hitting something that is already solved in next. > for parted-git I still get: I assume parted-git means the next branch in the git repo. > echo n | ./parted ---pretend-input-tty testfile \ > "mklabel gpt mkpart primary ext3 1 -1" > Error: Can't have the end before the start! I have the same results as you. I think this is due to the fact that when there is not size type, it defaults to Mb. So, this behavior is expected. > > However, for parted-git and doing as in the test case: > echo n | ./parted ---pretend-input-tty testfile \ > "mklabel gpt mkpart primary ext3 1s -1s" hrm, I had not noticed that I had missed the "s", good catch. > Warning: The existing disk label on > /.th/thsrc/archive/gnu/parted/parted-git/parted/testfile will be destroyed > and all data on this disk will be lost. Do you want to continue? > /home/pcl321/peb/archive/gnu/parted/parted-git/parted/.libs/lt-parted: > invalid token: mkpart > Yes/No? n My results: 1. if I do a `./configure --without-readline` and then install I get the result you are seeing [*], but my `make check` still does not fail. I assume thtat the normalize scripts take care or this. The normilize scripts are the sed lines. 2. if I do a `./configure` and then install I get the same output except for the "n" at the end of the yes/no question. And my `make check` does not fail. 3. if I do a `./configure --without-device-mapper` its the same as 3. What distro are you using? Maybe I can reproduce if I can get closer to what your environment looks like. [*] : the "n" at the end of the yes/no question. Regards. -- Joel Andres Granados Brno, Czech Republic, Red Hat.
pgpNXFQsPeANh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ bug-parted mailing list bug-parted@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
