On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 03:01:34PM +0200, Peter Breitenlohner wrote: > On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Joel Granados wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:53:11AM +0200, Peter Breitenlohner wrote: >>> The above was with parted-1.9.0; >> >> Untill now, there is no interest in maintaining a bug fix branch for >> 1.9.0. > > Hi Joel, > > I did this by mistake. Once done wanted to report the result.
ok > >> ... Especially for something that happens in a test, .... > > Well, failed tests are sort of embarrassing, at least as long as the reason > is not understood. Agreed :) > >> I assume parted-git means the next branch in the git repo. > > I hope so; the output from 'git branch' is: > * master > next > and 'git pull' gives: > Already up-to-date. You are _not_ on next, you are on master branch. pls do a `git checkout next` and repeat the tests. FYI, master == 1.9.0. Remember to do the whole process from the beginning. 1. bootstrap, 2. configure. 3. make 4. sudo make check TESTS 1. Do the `make check` and see if you still have the failure in t7000. There will be failures in other tests. but these also fail for me and need to be addressed. 2. Execute the test line directly dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=512c count=100 echo n | sudo PREFIX/sbin/parted ---pretend-input-tty testfile "mklabel gpt mkpart primary ext3 1s -1s" > >> What distro are you using? Maybe I can reproduce if I can get closer to >> what your environment looks like. > > No distro, almost everything compiled from sources. hrm this will be fun to track down. ;) Thx for persisting BTW. -- Joel Andres Granados Brno, Czech Republic, Red Hat.
pgpJMZsyIfDLV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ bug-parted mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
