Re: C99 in standards.texi

[Karl Berry]

    I actually like the current wording, since it is only suggesting to
    use C99 features

Ah, I see the text says "take advantage of C99" if it is available.  Ok,
I guess.  Although I fail to see how it could be ever be clearer or more
portable to have both C99 and non-C99 branches in the sources, which is
the implication.  Faster, maybe, I guess.

But since that text was basically already there and is actually being
weakened, I can't see a real problem with it.

Passing on to rms ...

Thanks,
karl