bug-standards  

Messages by Thread

• Retiring DVI format from GNU coding standards Paul Eggert
  • Re: Retiring DVI format from GNU coding standards Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards.
• Bump copyright years Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards.
• Missing file in /prep/maintain/html_node Thérèse Godefroy
  • Re: Missing file in /prep/maintain/html_node Ineiev
• Incorrect/obsolete options in the table of long options Antonio Diaz Diaz
  • Re: Incorrect/obsolete options in the table of long options Collin Funk
  • Re: Incorrect/obsolete options in the table of long options Antonio Diaz Diaz
  • Re: Incorrect/obsolete options in the table of long options Alfred M. Szmidt
• Incorrect '@chapter' command and inconsistency Antonio Diaz Diaz
  • Re: Incorrect '@chapter' command and inconsistency Collin Funk
  • Re: Incorrect '@chapter' command and inconsistency Patrice Dumas
  • Re: Incorrect '@chapter' command and inconsistency Richard Stallman
  • Re: Incorrect '@chapter' command and inconsistency Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Incorrect '@chapter' command and inconsistency Antonio Diaz Diaz
• Re: OpenPGP keys Collin Funk
  • Re: OpenPGP keys Paul Eggert
  • Re: OpenPGP keys Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards.
  • Re: OpenPGP keys Collin Funk
  • Re: OpenPGP keys Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards.
  • Re: OpenPGP keys Collin Funk
  • Re: OpenPGP keys Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards.
  • Re: OpenPGP keys Werner Koch
  • Re: OpenPGP keys Richard Stallman
  • Re: OpenPGP keys Werner Koch
  • Re: OpenPGP keys Richard Stallman
  • Re: OpenPGP keys Richard Stallman
  • Re: OpenPGP keys Collin Funk
  • Re: OpenPGP keys Richard Stallman
• Please fix a typo Ineiev
  • Re: Please fix a typo Alfred M. Szmidt
• [PATCH] getopt: Allow getopt_long to match translated option names Vivien Kraus
  • Re: [PATCH] getopt: Allow getopt_long to match translated option names Collin Funk
  • Re: [PATCH] getopt: Allow getopt_long to match translated option names Richard Stallman
• [no subject] jason oak
• Re: [Comment] Re: [gnu.org #1387060] Using CC0 for a README file Ineiev
• [Comment] Re: Re: [gnu.org #1387060] Using CC0 for a README file Ineiev via RT
• How to handle run-time program configuration aside from command-line arguments? Vivien Kraus
  • Re: How to handle run-time program configuration aside from command-line arguments? Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: How to handle run-time program configuration aside from command-line arguments? Vivien Kraus
  • Re: How to handle run-time program configuration aside from command-line arguments? Alfred M. Szmidt
• Translating long option names Vivien Kraus
  • Re: Translating long option names Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards.
  • Re: Translating long option names Vivien Kraus
  • Re: Translating long option names Arsen Arsenović
  • Re: Translating long option names Richard Stallman
  • Re: Translating long option names Richard Stallman
  • Re: Translating long option names Vivien Kraus
  • Re: Translating long option names Richard Stallman
• www/prep/maintain/html_node Copyright-Papers.html Krzysztof Siewicz
  • Re: www/prep/maintain/html_node Copyright-Papers.html Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: www/prep/maintain/html_node Copyright-Papers.html Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: www/prep/maintain/html_node Copyright-Papers.html Krzysztof Siewicz
  • Re: www/prep/maintain/html_node Copyright-Papers.html Richard Stallman
  • Re: www/prep/maintain/html_node Copyright-Papers.html Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: www/prep/maintain/html_node Copyright-Papers.html Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: www/prep/maintain/html_node Copyright-Papers.html Krzysztof Siewicz
• GNU coding standards Martin D Kealey
  • Re: GNU coding standards Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GNU coding standards Bruno Haible
  • Re: GNU coding standards Collin Funk
  • Re: GNU coding standards Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GNU coding standards Arsen Arsenović
  • Re: GNU coding standards Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GNU coding standards Arsen Arsenović
  • Re: GNU coding standards Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GNU coding standards Arsen Arsenović
  • Re: GNU coding standards Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU coding standards Arsen Arsenović
  • Re: GNU coding standards Martin D Kealey
  • Re: GNU coding standards Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU coding standards Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU coding standards Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards.
  • Re: GNU coding standards Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU coding standards Richard Stallman
• Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards for command-line interfaces David Apps
  • Re: Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards for command-line interfaces Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards for command-line interfaces David Apps
  • Re: Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards for command-line interfaces Richard Stallman
  • Re: Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards for command-line interfaces Bruno Haible
  • Re: Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards for command-line interfaces Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards for command-line interfaces Richard Stallman
  • Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards for command-line interfaces David Apps
  • Re: Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards for command-line interfaces Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards for command-line interfaces Richard Stallman
  • Re: Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards for command-line interfaces Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards for command-line interfaces David Apps
• Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section Kang-Che Sung
  • Re: Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section Paul Smith
  • Re: Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section Kang-Che Sung
  • Re: Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section Paul Smith
  • Re: Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section Paul Smith
  • Re: Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section Kang-Che Sung
  • Re: Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: what is autotools, what is gnulib Bruno Haible
  • Re: what is autotools, what is gnulib Paul Smith
• standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Paul Eggert
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Bruno Haible
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Jose E. Marchesi
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Richard Stallman
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Richard Stallman
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Paul Eggert
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Paul Eggert
  • ISO opposes variable-length arrays??? Richard Stallman
  • Re: ISO opposes variable-length arrays??? Paul Eggert
  • Re: ISO opposes variable-length arrays??? Richard Stallman
  • Re: ISO opposes variable-length arrays??? Paul Eggert
  • Re: ISO opposes variable-length arrays??? Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards.
  • Re: ISO opposes variable-length arrays??? Richard Stallman
  • Re: ISO opposes variable-length arrays??? Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards.
  • Re: ISO opposes variable-length arrays??? Paul Eggert
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Richard Stallman
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Paul Eggert
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Richard Stallman
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Paul Eggert
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Collin Funk
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Richard Stallman
  • Re: CVS (was: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards) Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards.
  • Re: CVS (was: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards) Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: CVS Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards.
  • Re: CVS Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: CVS Arsen Arsenović
  • Re: CVS Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: CVS (was: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards) Jason Self
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Paul Eggert
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Paul Eggert
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Richard Stallman
  • Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards Richard Stallman
• Re: compressed release distribution formats (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Antonio Diaz Diaz
• purpose and implementation of code reviews Bruno Haible
  • Re: purpose and implementation of code reviews Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: purpose and implementation of code reviews Richard Stallman
  • Re: purpose and implementation of code reviews Patrice Dumas
  • Re: purpose and implementation of code reviews Richard Stallman
• GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Karl Berry
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Richard Stallman
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Zack Weinberg
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bruno Haible
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bruno Haible
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor dherring
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jose E. Marchesi
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jose E. Marchesi
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jose E. Marchesi
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Tomas Volf
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: libsystemd dependencies Bruno Haible
  • Re: libsystemd dependencies Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: follow-up on backdoor CPU usage (was: libsystemd dependencies) Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: libsystemd dependencies Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: reproducible dists and builds (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Russ Allbery
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Peter Johansson
  • Should the GNU Coding Standards make a recommendation about aclocal's `--install` flag? (was: "Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor") Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: automated release building service Bruno Haible
  • Re: automated release building service Tomas Volf
  • Re: automated release building service Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: automated release building service Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: binary data in source trees (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Alexandre Oliva
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bruno Haible
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Zack Weinberg
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Russ Allbery
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Zack Weinberg
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bruno Haible
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer

• Earlier messages