Sorry for the delay. On 09/06/2013 11:44 PM, Karl Berry wrote: > > eblake> hence my proposed wording patch to make-stds.texi > > Ah, I see now. Looks generally fine. Thanks. > > Automake would also need a tweak to add run_DATA alongside its > existing localstate_DATA primary. > > Stefano? (See other msgs for background.) > If you all agree this is good, I don't see any problem with this change.
(But I'm not sure when I'll look into writing an actual patch for Automake though; if anyone wants to got for it, patches are always welcome). > (I feel sure that rms will be much happier if you, ie, "automake > maintainers", have explicitly said you're ok with the change. Will > explicitly cc you this time in case your bug-standards mail is getting > filed ...) > As I see it, this is more of an GCS- and Autoconf- related change that requires a follow-up change to Automake. So, if the autoconf guys are OK with it, I am too. Thanks, Stefano
