> Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 09:11:32 +0200 (CEST)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected]
> From: Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > We sometimes use "note" in a different way, in the sense of a musical
> > > note.
> >
> > Okay, but then why does it have to be in @strong?
>
> Why not? We use it as documented:
We are miscommunicating. The suggestion to reword was met with ``we
cannot do this in this manual'', so I asked for examples which cannot
be reworded. If the only change that's needed to avoid the problem
is to replace @strong with @emph or some such, that's a good solution,
IMHO, it doesn't even qualify as rewording.
> What do you think of a [EMAIL PROTECTED]' instruction, something like
>
> @[EMAIL PROTECTED] value}}
Warnings are either useful or not. If they aren't useful, they should
be removed; if they are useful, then turning them off goes against
their introduction in the first place.
> @node breve
> @section breve
>
> @strong{note value}, twice as long as a whole note. Mainly used in
> pre-1650 music.
Will @emph do?
_______________________________________________
Texinfo home page: http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-texinfo
