> > What do you think of a [EMAIL PROTECTED]' instruction, something like
> >
> > @[EMAIL PROTECTED] value}}
>
> Warnings are either useful or not. If they aren't useful, they should
> be removed; if they are useful, then turning them off goes against
> their introduction in the first place.
I don't think so. Compare this C compilers, for example: It provides
the #pragma directive to specifically suppress warnings if the user
wishes to do so. In the particular case of `note' I don't see any
other good solution.
>
> > @node breve
> > @section breve
> >
> > @strong{note value}, twice as long as a whole note. Mainly used in
> > pre-1650 music.
>
> Will @emph do?
Of course it will, somehow. But this misses the point. Having the
`note' warning is a useful thing in general but it's annoying that I
can't suppress it for the cases where it is completely nonsense. It
is a matter of fact that the English word `note' has more than a
single meaning. I'm quite sure that the author of this makeinfo
warning has never thought of the musical meaning.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Texinfo home page: http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-texinfo
