> From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0...@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:53:31 +0100 > > I agree that the warning is not really necessary. I don't mind > either way. It's up to you if you want to try to remove the warning. > It's questionable whether lone @node without a following sectioning > command is proper Texinfo. or what these constructs mean or how they should > be output.
IMO, removing it would be a regression. Either we should have a separate setting for warning about missing sectioning commands, or the warning should stay (or be replaced by a smarter one, like I wrote in my previous message). Most Texinfo manuals are intended to have a sectioning command in each node, so this warning catches mistakes and is thus IMO valuable in a vast majority of cases.
