On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:06:05AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0...@gmail.com> > > Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:53:31 +0100 > > > > I agree that the warning is not really necessary. I don't mind > > either way. It's up to you if you want to try to remove the warning. > > It's questionable whether lone @node without a following sectioning > > command is proper Texinfo. or what these constructs mean or how they should > > be output. > > IMO, removing it would be a regression. Either we should have a > separate setting for warning about missing sectioning commands, or the > warning should stay (or be replaced by a smarter one, like I wrote in > my previous message). > > Most Texinfo manuals are intended to have a sectioning command in each > node, so this warning catches mistakes and is thus IMO valuable in a > vast majority of cases.
Ok, I leave it as it is now. -- Pat
