On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 07:58:42PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote: > On Sat, Aug 08, 2026 at 03:26:02PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 05:26:10PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote: > > > That should be ok, as long as we avoid creating shadow targets if there > > > is an associated node (my patch to texinfo.tex avoided this). Then > > > outputting a warning won't affect many existing manuals. > > > > I have implemented the changes we discussed about. > > Is there any way to get nodes added for lone sectioning commands rather > than anchors? > > I tried running texi2any with "-c USE_NODES=0" but it made no difference. > Is there any way to configure this with USE_NODES or other variable?
Yes, with -c TREE_TRANSFORMATIONS=insert_nodes_for_sectioning_commands I previously wanted to add another value for USE_NODES, but in the end using "-c TREE_TRANSFORMATIONS=insert_nodes_for_sectioning_commands" seems best to me. The real question is whether we should make is the default. In that case, maybe we could add a customization variable to avoid doing it. > Earlier email: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2026-07/msg00068.html
