On 03/22/2018 02:01 PM, Aniketh Gireesh wrote: > Further, In my opinion, I think it would be better as a different > library/directory. I think that would be a better refactoring method as > well as it would be easier to work on the codebase at a later point in > time. Further, as far as my understanding goes, libwget is a library > handling HTTP, helping in creating an HTTP request. It seems better to have > something different to handle DNS and other things regarding that. It would > feel like all cluttered up inside libwget. > > If this is not the way we want it in Wget2, just let me know. I will change > the proposal as well as the plans for implementation :)
Since your code will likely use functions from libwget and the other way round, we should place it in libwget/. But if it makes your development easier during GSOC, feel free to put it into a separate directory. For the future we have a splitting of libwget in several libraries in mind, but it currently has low priority. We may have some day libwget-common, libwget-doh, libwget-warc, ... Regards, Tim
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
