DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11331>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11331 stale cgi process entries ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-08-13 19:14 ------- Just to let you know, I checked out the 2.0.36 webserver that I built several weeks ago (on a different machine), and I found similar stale cgi processes there too. Over the weekend, Amanda couldn't even start running because the process table was exausted... there were literally thousands of processes left behind. Today I upgraded to 2.0.40, and the problem is still there. Here are a few more examples of what the output of ps looks like: USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND abatko 56729 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?? Z 2:49PM 0:00.00 (python) abatko 56731 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?? Z 2:50PM 0:00.00 (sh) abatko 56734 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?? Z 2:50PM 0:00.00 (perl) abatko 56735 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?? Z 2:50PM 0:00.00 (sh) abatko 56742 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?? Z 2:51PM 0:00.00 (c.cgi) abatko 56743 10.0 0.0 0 0 ?? Z 2:51PM 0:00.00 (perl) abatko 56750 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?? Z 2:51PM 0:00.00 (perl) abatko 56755 3.0 0.0 0 0 ?? Z 2:51PM 0:00.00 (perl) abatko 56756 19.0 0.0 0 0 ?? Z 2:51PM 0:00.00 (perl) Sometimes (but I haven't figured out how, or why), there will be an entry that ends with ``(suexec)''. Please let me know if you need any other information in this regard. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
