DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38227>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38227 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-06 08:15 ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Thank you very much for your detailed post. I suspect a thing that has been > fixed meanwhile. Could you please give > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.2.1.tar.gz a try? I certainly would be happy to! I was about to post that I had added some more debugging and discovered that mod_proxy was emitting info that it had initialized worker->id 0 and worked->id 2, but not worker->id 1, and that mod_proxy_ajp was being handed worker->id 1. Dunno if that was the problem being resolved in the fix. I will try 2.2.1 right now. It'll take me a few minutes to compile and test, but I'll post back here within the hour. > Actually there is only *one* more connection, but as httpd and Tomcat are > running on the same server you see *both* ends of the tcp connection in Sorry, reading my original post shows I put too much stress on the high number of connections. I was in fact realizing the two lines were from the same connection, I was just surprised that new sockets kept getting added instead of old ones being reused. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
