On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 05:11:35PM +0000, Alexey E. Suslikov wrote:
> Theo de Raadt <deraadt <at> cvs.openbsd.org> writes:
> 
> > If these VM's are real VM's the should start emulating the machines
> > they claim to be emulating correctly, or they should start advertising
> > that they are something "different", so that we can isolate the bullshit
> > factor.
> 
> Ok. I see.
> 
> Could we trim that down to the following?
> 
> --- sys/arch/amd64/amd64/identcpu.c.orig      Mon May 20 19:58:06 2013
> +++ sys/arch/amd64/amd64/identcpu.c   Mon May 20 20:01:08 2013
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@
>       { CPUIDECX_AVX,         "AVX" },
>       { CPUIDECX_F16C,        "F16C" },
>       { CPUIDECX_RDRAND,      "RDRAND" },
> +     { CPUIDECX_HV,  "HV" },
>  }, cpu_ecpuid_ecxfeatures[] = {
>       { CPUIDECX_LAHF,        "LAHF" },
>       { CPUIDECX_CMPLEG,      "CMPLEG" },
> --- sys/arch/amd64/include/specialreg.h.orig  Mon May 20 20:01:56 2013
> +++ sys/arch/amd64/include/specialreg.h       Mon May 20 20:06:09 2013
> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@
>  #define      CPUIDECX_AVX    0x10000000      /* Advanced Vector Extensions */
>  #define      CPUIDECX_F16C   0x20000000      /* 16bit fp conversion  */
>  #define      CPUIDECX_RDRAND 0x40000000      /* RDRAND instruction  */
> +#define      CPUIDECX_HV     0x80000000              /* Hypervisor presence 
> */
>  
>  /*
>   * "Structured Extended Feature Flags Parameters" (CPUID function 0x7, leaf 
> 0)
> 

That's certainly less objectionable but I'm not sure what useful information
this diff provides.

Reply via email to