On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> wrote: >> I'm not trying to convince, but avoid useless work/talk in the future: > > Yes you are. You have an agenda. > > You want to make us work around a bug, rather than talk to the > originators of the problem.
While I see practical use, someone don't. I call this disagreement. There is no problem for me if somebody disagree with a plan I have. It's normal. Btw, Intel's doc I have found at http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/application-notes/processor-identification-cpuid-instruction-note.pdf says "31 Not Used Always returns 0".
