On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 04:35:40PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| Thanks for your reply. Yours and an off-list reply both pointed at
| the HZ parameter. I built a kernel with HZ=1000, and things now work
| much better in the vm.
I spoke too soon :-(
Things do work better, but the clock is still slow:
[weerd@vm1] $ rdate -npv ${N}; uptime
Fri May 12 16:50:14 CEST 2017
rdate: adjust local clock by 124.798956 seconds
4:48PM up 16 mins, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
So, in 16 minutes, the clock is 2 minutes behind. So, a lot better,
but still falling behind.
[weerd@vm1] $ rdate -npv ${N}; time sleep 600; rdate -npv ${N}
Fri May 12 16:51:47 CEST 2017
rdate: adjust local clock by 135.359214 seconds
10m03.01s real 0m00.00s user 0m00.00s system
Fri May 12 17:03:08 CEST 2017
rdate: adjust local clock by 213.572802 seconds
Which turns out to be almost 8 seconds per minute.
Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
--
>++++++++[<++++++++++>-]<+++++++.>+++[<------>-]<.>+++[<+
+++++++++++>-]<.>++[<------------>-]<+.--------------.[-]
http://www.weirdnet.nl/
