Chris Johns commented on a discussion on rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-bsd-syscall-api.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/pkg/rtems-libbsd/-/merge_requests/153#note_155951 > #include <rtems/seterr.h> > #include <stdio.h> > > +static int rtems_bsd_pipe(int fildes[2], int flags); > +int pipe(int fildes[2]); > +int pipe2(int fildes[2], int flags); Thanks. I am not comfortable using weak. It is better than a depending on the link order but only just. I suggest we go with the current implementation as is in the this merge for just `7-freebsd-14` and I will open a new issue on `rtems.git` to change the `pipe()` to make it an indirect call LibBSD can override at runtime. Once that change is in we return to `7-freebd-14` and update the code to use the indirect call. We discussed this at the RTEMS weekly meeting and we feel adding an indirect call is a simple way to manage the problem plus it also provides other networking stack a way to handle this. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/pkg/rtems-libbsd/-/merge_requests/153#note_155951 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org. Unsubscribe from this thread: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/sent_notifications/4-bv2nc3hrjnrcvr9vhcygyjja6-k/unsubscribe | Manage all notifications: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/profile/notifications | Help: https://gitlab.rtems.org/help
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
