Chris Johns commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/work_items/5657#note_156851 Git and GitLab history are both metadata. RTEMS as a project has always been release focused. A release contains the release notes captured from the GitLab metadata. The release notes are provided as HTML, PDF and the original JSON data extracted from GitLab. Users should be using releases. A release is a collection of [sources](https://docs.rtems.org/docs/main/eng/release-process.html#releases) as tar files and patches as files. See [6.2 sources](https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/releases/6/6.2/sources/). Release are now provided as a single tar file. See [6 release tar files](https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/releases/6/tar/). Release tar files have published check sums and each release contains check sums for each tar file including the RSB and that contains check sums so each piece can be checked. There is no git (or any other version control system) history provided. I am not sure what value there is in software developers discussing the merits of legal arguments, complex or not. Is this a case of square pegs and round holes? -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/work_items/5657#note_156851 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org. Unsubscribe from this thread: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/sent_notifications/5-5lnbxagaxaj4n873ouvo3hv0z-1d/unsubscribe | Manage all notifications: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/profile/notifications | Help: https://gitlab.rtems.org/help
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
