Joel Sherrill commented on a discussion on shell/memory_commands.md: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/docs/rtems-docs/-/merge_requests/261#note_159105 > : The following is an example of how to use `mdump`: > > ```shell > - SHLL [/] $ mdump 0x10000 32 > - 0x0001000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ > - 0x0001001000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ > - SHLL [/] $ mdump 0x02000000 32 > - 0x02000000A1 48 00 00 29 00 80 33-81 C5 22 BC A6 10 21 00 .H..)..3.."...!. > - 0x02000010A1 48 00 00 29 00 80 33-81 C5 22 BC A6 10 21 01 .H..)..3.."...!. > - SHLL [/] $ mdump 0x02001000 32 > - 0x0200100003 00 80 00 82 10 60 00-81 98 40 00 83 48 00 00 ......`.....H.. > - 0x0200101084 00 60 01 84 08 A0 07-86 10 20 01 87 28 C0 02 ..`....... ..(.. > + SHLL [/] # mdump 0x40000000 32 > + 40000000 A0 10 00 00 29 10 00 04-81 C5 20 00 A6 10 20 00 ....)..... ... > . Hacked a bit and confirmed that _printk()_ does not add 0x as a prefix. ``` *** Start of printf/printk Test *** printk p=0x1234568 printf p=0x1234568 printk main=0x4000121c printk main= 4000121c printf main=0x4000121c printf main= 0x4000121c *** End of printf/printk Test *** ``` [printk_printf.tar.bz2](/uploads/94186bdcb8a4114bd4bd6ba08a431736/printk_printf.tar.bz2) Does printk() need fixing? Do we reject this documentation MR? I don't like printk() not matching out printf() for a basic pointer print. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/docs/rtems-docs/-/merge_requests/261#note_159105 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org. Unsubscribe from this thread: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/namespace/19/sent_notifications/5-c8rmltfbdomh1dh0hytlqq385-j/unsubscribe | Manage all notifications: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/profile/notifications | Help: https://gitlab.rtems.org/help
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
