Issue created by Kinsey Moore: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/tools/rtems-source-builder/-/work_items/218
## Summary This is something I've internalized since quite some time, but presents complications for users accustomed to other GCC distribution methods. Typically, a compressed archive of GNU tools such as those provided by Linaro, etc. can be unpacked to an arbitrary location and used there without issue. RTEMS tooling is locked to a given prefix and will not work properly outside of that. Since RTEMS tooling is locked to a prefix, it cannot be moved or unpacked to a different prefix without recompiling the entire tool set which could take hours on some systems. Is there a particular reason we do not build GNU tooling in a relocatable form? ## Steps to reproduce <!-- Pre-set options - milestone --> -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/tools/rtems-source-builder/-/work_items/218 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org. Unsubscribe from this thread: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/namespace/14/sent_notifications/6-130a4cp76t29zm3wlm7mv7lur-e/unsubscribe | Manage all notifications: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/profile/notifications | Help: https://gitlab.rtems.org/help
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
