Hi, On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 06:34:47AM -0500, John wrote: > On my Debian 2.2 system 'man' was installed > suid root. I don't know about Debian 2.3 but, > Debian 2.2 does install 'man' suid root. No, this is not true: $ ls -la /usr/lib/man-db/man -rwsr-xr-x 1 man root 82848 Apr 4 2000 /usr/lib/man-db/man $ This is the actual man binary (/usr/bin/man is only a wrapper, did not examine closer what it does, but it has no setu/gid bit set), after a plain Debian 2.2 potato install. Andreas -- After the last of 16 mounting screws has been removed from an access cover, it will be discovered that the wrong access cover has been removed.
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vul... Martin Schulze
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... Jose Nazario
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Nate Eldredge
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... Robert Bihlmeyer
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vul... Robert van der Meulen
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... Valdis Kletnieks
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... Ethan Benson
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... John
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Megyer Ur
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package forma... Foldi Tamas
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Andreas Ferber
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Graham Hughes
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Matt Zimmerman
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... Mate Wierdl
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... Roman Drahtmueller
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Kris Kennaway
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vulnerab... Darren Moffat
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vul... Seth Arnold
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vul... Dan Harkless
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vul... David Luyer
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vulnerab... Darren Moffat