On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 06:34:47AM -0500, John wrote: > On my Debian 2.2 system 'man' was installed > suid root. I don't know about Debian 2.3 but, > Debian 2.2 does install 'man' suid root. Are you certain? In Debian stable (2.2, potato), man is installed setgid man. In Debian unstable and testing (sid, woody), man is now installed setuid man (for reasons noted elsewhere in this thread). If you actually have a situation where man has been installed setuid root, it would be a very serious bug, and you should report which architecture and version of the man-db package you are using. -- - mdz
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Nate Eldredge
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... Robert Bihlmeyer
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vul... Robert van der Meulen
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... Valdis Kletnieks
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... Ethan Benson
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... John
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Megyer Ur
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package forma... Foldi Tamas
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Andreas Ferber
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Graham Hughes
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Matt Zimmerman
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... Mate Wierdl
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... Roman Drahtmueller
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Kris Kennaway
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vulnerab... Darren Moffat
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vul... Seth Arnold
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vul... Dan Harkless
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vul... David Luyer
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vulnerab... Darren Moffat