On Jul 11, 2008, at 10:00 AM, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:

Jonathan Gibbons skrev  den 11-07-2008 13:52:

Yes, that technique can work well. But either way, the next step is
to try writing the code to analyze the build log, to see how far the general idea can be taken, and how much interest there is to track/fix warnings.

Personally I'd like there to be no warnings at all, and would like to contribute work to get there


Thank you.

Getting rid of the actual warnings will require cooperation from the teams who are responsible for the various parts of the code. In some cases, there may be resistance, since stability is sometimes preferred over "no warnings". That being said, what I'm hoping to achieve with this discussion and any related effort is a non- intrusive way of gathering information about warnings, so that we have a better understanding of where the warnings are, in what areas of the code and in which source files. That way, we can work with the teams involved to see if there is interest in reducing their warning count in as safe a way as possible. Any assistance in getting to that point
would be welcome.

(Note that anyone contributing to OpenJDK must first sign the Sun Contributor Agreement;
you can find details at http://sca.dev.java.net.)

-- Jon


Reply via email to