Just curious, would part of this revision process entail removing
calls to deprecated methods and replacing them with their documented
replacement methods?
There are many warnings about calls to deprecated methods in the
OpenJDK code.
Rob Ross, Lead Software Engineer
E! Networks
---------------------------------------------------
"Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his
heart he dreams himself your master." -- Commissioner Pravin Lal
On Jul 11, 2008, at 10:43 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On Jul 11, 2008, at 10:00 AM, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
Jonathan Gibbons skrev den 11-07-2008 13:52:
Yes, that technique can work well. But either way, the next step is
to try writing the code to analyze the build log, to see how far
the general
idea can be taken, and how much interest there is to track/fix
warnings.
Personally I'd like there to be no warnings at all, and would like
to contribute work to get there
Thank you.
Getting rid of the actual warnings will require cooperation from
the teams who are
responsible for the various parts of the code. In some cases, there
may be resistance,
since stability is sometimes preferred over "no warnings". That
being said, what I'm
hoping to achieve with this discussion and any related effort is a
non-intrusive way
of gathering information about warnings, so that we have a better
understanding of
where the warnings are, in what areas of the code and in which
source files. That way,
we can work with the teams involved to see if there is interest in
reducing their
warning count in as safe a way as possible. Any assistance in
getting to that point
would be welcome.
(Note that anyone contributing to OpenJDK must first sign the Sun
Contributor Agreement;
you can find details at http://sca.dev.java.net.)
-- Jon
