On 23/02/2013 10:29, David Holmes wrote:
Just be aware there's a lot more involved in doing this than just
changing one a name in a makefile.
You beat to me too! Yes, there are likely a lot of scripts and paths
that assume the image name is j2sdk-image or j2re-image so renaming will
be a bit disruptive.
Also I think the initial goal of the new build system was to get it to
the point where it generated the "same bits" as the old build. I assume
this is why the new build went for the same directory names as the old
build (and probably because of scripts depending on the name too).
-Alan
