Do the security tests have a particular requirement to run against the exploded jdk? Why not just test against the images?
Mike On Aug 16 2013, at 01:46 , Erik Joelsson wrote: > Finally able to revisit this patch: > > With this patch the security tests will again be runnable on the exploded jdk > image. The main changes are: > > * The security classes are compiled separately to a different output > directory. > * The security jars are created in the jdk target (instead of images) and put > in the jdk/lib/... directories. > > Also did: > * Removed now redundant entries in rt.jar exclude list > * Changed source location for signing unsigned jars > * Made the SetupJavaCompilation macro more friendly with multiple setups > sharing output directories. > > The reason it had to wait was that this design did not work with sjavac. > Sjavac has now been fixed in jdk8-tl. > > /Erik
