As Chris pointed out, we have a patch that's already been reviewed, so
making the change is trivial. I do think a bit of a heads up to jdk9-dev
is a good idea though.
/Erik
On 2014-04-03 12:04, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/04/2014 09:53, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I don't see any reason not to make the switch. I filed this bug back
in December:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030794
Thanks, I can't think of any reason either.
So how do we make this happen? Would a mail to jdk9-dev be sufficient
to alert folks about this change? Maybe the error from configure when
there isn't a JDK 8 available is sufficient?
-Alan
