Hi Magnus Unfortunately the patch itself is as big as 2 megabytes and will therefore get removed… Now I’m really stuck.
Cheers Patrick > Am 14.11.2014 um 09:45 schrieb Magnus Ihse Bursie > <magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com>: > > Hi Patrick, > > I'm sorry for all the trouble you have encountered when trying to help > improving OpenJDK. :( > > Try sending the patch only (not the webrev), as normal inlined text (not an > attachment) in a mail to the list. I can create a webrev and put it on > cr.openjdk.java.net <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/> for you. > > /Magnus > > 14 nov 2014 kl. 09:24 skrev Patrick Reinhart <patr...@reini.net > <mailto:patr...@reini.net>>: > >> Hi David, >> >> I’ve got a mail that the attachment was too big and was held by the >> moderator approval. I personally would love to put that on >> cr.openjdk.java.net <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/> but to put it there it >> seems that I fist has to be contributor and in order to be that I had be >> submit some patches first :-( >> >> It seems I’m stuck in a recursive loop somehow ;-) >> >> >> Cheers Patrick >> >> PS: I did already contributed two fixes for the 2d printing part in the past. >> >> >>> Am 14.11.2014 um 09:01 schrieb David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com >>> <mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com>>: >>> >>> On 14/11/2014 5:36 PM, Patrick Reinhart wrote: >>>> An attachment in the email has been found to contain executable code and >>>> has been removed. >>>> >>>> File removed : webrev.zip, zip,html,js >>> >>> Unclear what removed the attachment. :( >>> >>> David >>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Attached the webrev >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Am 14.11.2014 um 03:18 schrieb David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com >>>>> <mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com>>: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Patrick, >>>>> >>>>> On 14/11/2014 12:15 AM, Patrick Reinhart wrote: >>>>>> Hi Magnus, >>>>>> >>>>>> I actually merged down the freetype compilation from the source during >>>>>> the configuration cycle as it’s being done in JDK9 actually. This was >>>>>> not that straightforward but I could sort that out and had a successful >>>>>> compilation afterwards. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is the link to the webrev: >>>>>> http://reinharts.dyndns.org/buildjdk8win/webrev/ >>>>>> <http://reinharts.dyndns.org/buildjdk8win/webrev/> >>>>>> <http://reinharts.dyndns.org/buildjdk8win/webrev/ >>>>>> <http://reinharts.dyndns.org/buildjdk8win/webrev/>> >>>>> >>>>> Please note that patches have to be submitted via OpenJDK infrastructure: >>>>> cr.openjdk.java.net <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/> or email attachment to >>>>> OpenJDK mailing list. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> David >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/legal/tou/ >>>>> <http://openjdk.java.net/legal/tou/> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> Patrick >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 13.11.2014 um 14:50 schrieb Magnus Ihse Bursie >>>>>>> <magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com <mailto:magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com>>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2014-11-12 19:34, Patrick Reinhart wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi there, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I’m updating the Adopt OpenJDK website with build instructions to >>>>>>>> build the OpenJDK on Windows 8.1. In order to lower the effort of >>>>>>>> building also the OpenJDK 8 on Windows, myself and some colleges have >>>>>>>> back ported the build scripts from OpenJDK 9. We also could provide a >>>>>>>> webrev containing all changes we made. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could someone sponsor this back port? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure, I can sponsor that! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is the patch straightforward to apply on jdk9 from jdk8? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /Magnus >>>>>> >>>> >>
