Hello Patrick, try reverting common/autoconf/generated-configure before
generating the patch. That file does not need to be reviewed as it's
just generated anyway. That should reduce the patch size.
/Erik
On 2014-11-14 09:54, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
Hi Magnus
Unfortunately the patch itself is as big as 2 megabytes and will therefore get
removed… Now I’m really stuck.
Cheers Patrick
Am 14.11.2014 um 09:45 schrieb Magnus Ihse Bursie
<magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com>:
Hi Patrick,
I'm sorry for all the trouble you have encountered when trying to help
improving OpenJDK. :(
Try sending the patch only (not the webrev), as normal inlined text (not an
attachment) in a mail to the list. I can create a webrev and put it on
cr.openjdk.java.net <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/> for you.
/Magnus
14 nov 2014 kl. 09:24 skrev Patrick Reinhart <patr...@reini.net
<mailto:patr...@reini.net>>:
Hi David,
I’ve got a mail that the attachment was too big and was held by the moderator
approval. I personally would love to put that on cr.openjdk.java.net
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/> but to put it there it seems that I fist has to
be contributor and in order to be that I had be submit some patches first :-(
It seems I’m stuck in a recursive loop somehow ;-)
Cheers Patrick
PS: I did already contributed two fixes for the 2d printing part in the past.
Am 14.11.2014 um 09:01 schrieb David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com
<mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com>>:
On 14/11/2014 5:36 PM, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
An attachment in the email has been found to contain executable code and has
been removed.
File removed : webrev.zip, zip,html,js
Unclear what removed the attachment. :(
David
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Attached the webrev
Am 14.11.2014 um 03:18 schrieb David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com
<mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com>>:
Hi Patrick,
On 14/11/2014 12:15 AM, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
Hi Magnus,
I actually merged down the freetype compilation from the source during the
configuration cycle as it’s being done in JDK9 actually. This was not that
straightforward but I could sort that out and had a successful compilation
afterwards.
Here is the link to the webrev: http://reinharts.dyndns.org/buildjdk8win/webrev/
<http://reinharts.dyndns.org/buildjdk8win/webrev/>
<http://reinharts.dyndns.org/buildjdk8win/webrev/
<http://reinharts.dyndns.org/buildjdk8win/webrev/>>
Please note that patches have to be submitted via OpenJDK infrastructure:
cr.openjdk.java.net <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/> or email attachment to
OpenJDK mailing list.
Cheers,
David
[1] http://openjdk.java.net/legal/tou/ <http://openjdk.java.net/legal/tou/>
Cheers
Patrick
Am 13.11.2014 um 14:50 schrieb Magnus Ihse Bursie <magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com
<mailto:magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com>>:
On 2014-11-12 19:34, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
Hi there,
I’m updating the Adopt OpenJDK website with build instructions to build the
OpenJDK on Windows 8.1. In order to lower the effort of building also the
OpenJDK 8 on Windows, myself and some colleges have back ported the build
scripts from OpenJDK 9. We also could provide a webrev containing all changes
we made.
Could someone sponsor this back port?
Sure, I can sponsor that!
Is the patch straightforward to apply on jdk9 from jdk8?
/Magnus
