Hi Jesper, thank you. Yes, this was my experience last time I tried it, that the windows build configuration was missing and that the Indexer did not work as well as expected (did, of course, not find any system headers etc). I did not feel like putting work into it, so I went back to CDT. I might look at it again though.
Kind Regards, Thomas On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:45 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > The project in common/nb_native/nbproject does not have a build > configuration for Windows. The project itself should still be usable for > browsing the code, but it might require some changes to make it build > correctly. If you have a NetBeans / SolarisStudio installation on Windows > and want to make the changes required to add a build configuration for > Windows I'd be happy to sponsor the change. > > Thanks, > /Jesper > > > On 22 Mar 2017, at 18:34, Thomas Stüfe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Stanislav, > > > > last time I checked, there was no support for netbeans on Windows, is > that > > still the case? > > > > Thanks, Thomas > > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Stanislav Smirnov < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Mikael, > >> > >> why do not you try NetBeans that has openjdk project support out of the > >> box? > >> common/nb_native/nbproject > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Stanislav Smirnov > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> On 22 Mar 2017, at 17:21, Mikael Gerdin <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I've finally grown tired of manually setting up a hand crafted Eclipse > >> CDT configuration for the JVM sources and decided to share my progress > >> towards improving the overall situation for JVM developers. > >>> > >>> To achieve better IDE support without having to add project generators > >> for all different kinds of past or future IDEs I've decided to try to > >> leverage CMake to do project generation. > >>> The idea is to have the JDK build system generate a CMakeLists.txt > >> describing all the include paths and definitions required by an IDE to > >> interpret the sources correctly. > >>> > >>> Several modern IDEs natively support CMake but we can also rely on the > >> fact that the CMake build system has the ability to generate projects > for a > >> number of different IDEs. For information about which generators CMake > >> supports see > >>> https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.5/manual/cmake-generators.7.html > >>> for your CMake version. > >>> > >>> To try this out check out (heh) my branch "JDK-8177329-cmake-branch" in > >> the jdk10/sandbox forest: > >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/sandbox/branches > >>> So far I've only made changes in the toplevel and hotspot repositories. > >>> I've written a short readme in the repo: > >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/sandbox/raw-file/JDK- > >> 8177329-cmake-branch/README-cmake.html > >>> > >>> It would be great if people tried this out to see if it works on their > >> setup but I don't expect it to work on Windows without changing the > >> makefile to do path conversion. > >>> If we can make this work properly then perhaps we can get rid of the > >> Visual Studio generator and rely on CMake to generate VS projects. > >>> > >>> It would also be great if someone from build-dev could give me some > >> hints about how to do the file writing and "vardeps" thing properly. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> /Mikael > >> > >> > >
