Hi Stanislav, thanks. See my answer to Jesper. I was using Netbeans on Windows and was missing Windows Configuration files. Sorry for being unclear.
Kind Regards, Thomas On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Stanislav Smirnov < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > according to https://netbeans.org/downloads/ there is Windows platform > with C/C++ support if I understood you correctly. > > Best regards, > Stanislav Smirnov > > > > > > On 22 Mar 2017, at 20:34, Thomas Stüfe <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Stanislav, > > last time I checked, there was no support for netbeans on Windows, is that > still the case? > > Thanks, Thomas > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Stanislav Smirnov < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Mikael, >> >> why do not you try NetBeans that has openjdk project support out of the >> box? >> common/nb_native/nbproject >> >> Best regards, >> Stanislav Smirnov >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 22 Mar 2017, at 17:21, Mikael Gerdin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I've finally grown tired of manually setting up a hand crafted Eclipse >> CDT configuration for the JVM sources and decided to share my progress >> towards improving the overall situation for JVM developers. >> > >> > To achieve better IDE support without having to add project generators >> for all different kinds of past or future IDEs I've decided to try to >> leverage CMake to do project generation. >> > The idea is to have the JDK build system generate a CMakeLists.txt >> describing all the include paths and definitions required by an IDE to >> interpret the sources correctly. >> > >> > Several modern IDEs natively support CMake but we can also rely on the >> fact that the CMake build system has the ability to generate projects for a >> number of different IDEs. For information about which generators CMake >> supports see >> > https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.5/manual/cmake-generators.7.html >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cmake.org_cmake_help_v3.5_manual_cmake-2Dgenerators.7.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=9YfM3bKkWy3cpyWthRfyfAiQHbbMKEPL6snPxtZtjh8&m=hZmVYDLD5jMoRUkVz8XSkqkO_WmXFskfsKbJ4lRDXcU&s=Sd11q12ajJn0vRz4qbXDgiUXj_I9vj21kOa5c_hSLM8&e=> >> > for your CMake version. >> > >> > To try this out check out (heh) my branch "JDK-8177329-cmake-branch" in >> the jdk10/sandbox forest: >> > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/sandbox/branches >> > So far I've only made changes in the toplevel and hotspot repositories. >> > I've written a short readme in the repo: >> > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/sandbox/raw-file/JDK-817732 >> 9-cmake-branch/README-cmake.html >> > >> > It would be great if people tried this out to see if it works on their >> setup but I don't expect it to work on Windows without changing the >> makefile to do path conversion. >> > If we can make this work properly then perhaps we can get rid of the >> Visual Studio generator and rely on CMake to generate VS projects. >> > >> > It would also be great if someone from build-dev could give me some >> hints about how to do the file writing and "vardeps" thing properly. >> > >> > Thanks >> > /Mikael >> >> > >
