On 8/21/17 7:05 AM, Bob Vandette wrote:
No, I have not pushed this fix yet. I was waiting for you to look into the
CodeSectionProcessor issue.
Leave CodeSectionProcessor.java as it is - don't even change comment. I
will update it if needed. No updated webrev needed.
Do you want me to just push it?
Yes. I saw Erik reviewed build change.
Can you send me a diff of the change you want me to add?
Ignore my comment. jdk.tools.jaotc.test has already recorded in
suite.py. I missed it first.
Your change to suite.py is good.
Thanks,
Vladimir
Bob.
On Aug 19, 2017, at 3:46 PM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.koz...@oracle.com> wrote:
Bob, did you pushed it?
If not yes, please fix .mx.graal/suite.py for unit tests Rickard added. They
have dependency on jdk.tools.jaotc.collect:
test/compiler/aot/jdk.tools.jaotc.test/
They failed when I modified collect and other classes. We need to have
dependency on it in suite.py.
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 8/15/17 12:10 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
On 8/15/17 11:55 AM, Bob Vandette wrote:
Please review these changes for JDK 10 that remove all dependencies on libelf
from the JDK
build system.
Bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186115
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bobv/8186115/
Good.
Compiler team: Please check CodeSectionProcessor. Is the stepping through all
foreign call still necessary? I only removed the comment.
I will look. It could be the problem was not libelf but loader.
Thanks,
Vladimir
Thanks,
Bob.
