One reason it is difficult to move some of this into jtreg itself is
because some
of these handlers use recent/new APIs. That makes writing and/or
building jtreg
that much harder. But I agree in general with the overall goal of moving
stuff
into jtreg when it is practical to do so.
-- Jon
On 11/28/2017 02:03 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Every jtreg run would like to have the most helpful failure handling
possible. Should some/all of this be pushed into jtreg itself instead of
the makefiles?
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie <
magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> wrote:
The jtreg failure handler needs to be used when running tests using the
run-test framework.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8191933
WebRev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8191933-use-failure-han
dler-in-run-test/webrev.01
/Magnus
