Hi Paul,
There is sense in working in including the class file version update at
the same time if the added complexity doesn't delay the changes.
Did the patch for the increment to 54 require previous changes in the
bundled ASM?
Thanks,
-Joe
On 12/12/2017 9:31 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi Joe,
I would like to see the class file version increment [*] in the same
patch (the unified repo makes this easier now).
Then we have everything in one changeset (except for any ctsym
changes?) that can be easily templated when the next increment is
required, since we will be doing this far more regularly from now on.
Are there any technical impediments as to why this would be problematic?
Thanks,
Paul.
[*] here is the increment to 54
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/89829dd3cc54
