Hi Martin, I'm afraid that's not easy to answer. The fix didn't made it into 8u162 which will be released in January 2018 [1]. It is targeted for 8u172 but there is no time-line for 8u172 yet [2].
The best you can do is to ask on the 8u-dev [3] mailing list or ask the people at AdoptOpenJDK (adoption-disc...@openjdk.java.net [4]) to merge the fix into their current builds. That would be actually a good smoke test for their tool chain :) Regards, Volker [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/releases/8u162.html [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/ [3] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/jdk8u-dev [4] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/adoption-discuss On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Evans, Martin <martin.ev...@kingfisher.com> wrote: > Hi Volker, > > Happy new year! > > Do you have a rough idea as to when it will make it into the regular update? > > Kind regards, > > Martin > > -----Original Message----- > From: Volker Simonis [mailto:volker.simo...@gmail.com] > Sent: 22 December 2017 16:25 > To: Evans, Martin <martin.ev...@kingfisher.com> > Cc: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baes...@sap.com>; > jdk8u-dev-requ...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; > ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net; Simonis, Volker <volker.simo...@sap.com>; > build-dev <build-dev@openjdk.java.net> > Subject: Re: RFR [jdk8] : 8193807 : AIX: avoid UnsatisfiedLinkError by > providing empty basic implementations of getSystemCpuLoad and > getProcessCpuLoad > > Hi Martin, > > I've just pushed the fix to jdk8u/jdk8u-dev [1] so it should be in the next > regular 8u update (probably 8u172 ?). > > You can of course test it any time by building the tip of > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev yourself :) > > Merry Christmas and a happy new year, > Volker > > [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/def07b5ce3be > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Evans, Martin <martin.ev...@kingfisher.com> > wrote: >> Many thanks guys, I look forward to testing. >> >> Regards, >> >> Martin >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Volker Simonis [mailto:volker.simo...@gmail.com] >> Sent: 20 December 2017 09:33 >> To: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baes...@sap.com> >> Cc: jdk8u-dev-requ...@openjdk.java.net; >> core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net; >> Simonis, Volker <volker.simo...@sap.com>; Evans, Martin >> <martin.ev...@kingfisher.com>; build-dev <build-dev@openjdk.java.net> >> Subject: Re: RFR [jdk8] : 8193807 : AIX: avoid UnsatisfiedLinkError by >> providing empty basic implementations of getSystemCpuLoad and >> getProcessCpuLoad >> >> Hi Matthias, >> >> the change looks good! >> I can sponsor it once we get the approval. >> >> Also forwarded to buil-dev for the minimal build change. >> >> Thank you and best regards, >> Volker >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Baesken, Matthias >> <matthias.baes...@sap.com> wrote: >>> Hello , Mark reported this issue on AIX with OpenJDK8 : >>> >>>> >>>>I'm getting an unsatisfied link error when using logstash on AIX but I >>>>suspect the issue is with AIX or the JRE, the exception is: >>>> >>>> java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: >>>> sun.management.OperatingSystemImpl.getProcessCpuLoad()D >>>> getProcessCpuLoad at >>>> sun/management/OperatingSystemImpl.java:-2 >>>> <init> at >>>> org/logstash/instrument/monitors/ProcessMonitor.java:40 >>>> detect at >>>> org/logstash/instrument/monitors/ProcessMonitor.java:79 >>>> generate at >>>> org/logstash/instrument/reports/ProcessReport.java:15 >>>> >>>> this is the line in logstash: >>>> >>>> this.cpuProcessPercent = >>>> scaleLoadToPercent(unixOsBean.getProcessCpuLoad()); >>>> >>>> https://github.com/elastic/logstash/blob/master/logstash-core/src/ma >>>> i n/java/org/logstash/instrument/monitors/ProcessMonitor.java >>>> >>>> >>>> Could anybody help steer me in the right direction? >>>> >>> >>> This fix addresses the missing getSystemCpuLoad and getProcessCpuLoad on >>> AIX . >>> JDK8 is only affected , JDK9 and higher is not affected . >>> >>> Could I get a review for this change ? >>> >>> >>> Change : >>> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8193807/ >>> >>> Bug : >>> >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193807 >>> >>> >>> Thanks, Matthias >> ------------ Kingfisher plc Registered Office: 3 Sheldon Square, Paddington, >> London W2 6PX Registered in England, Number 1664812 This e-mail is only >> intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain >> confidential information. Unless stated to the contrary, any opinions or >> comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the official view >> of the company. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us >> immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. >> Please do not copy it or use it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to >> any other person. Thank you for your co-operation. > ------------ Kingfisher plc Registered Office: 3 Sheldon Square, Paddington, > London W2 6PX Registered in England, Number 1664812 This e-mail is only > intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain > confidential information. Unless stated to the contrary, any opinions or > comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the official view of > the company. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us > immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. > Please do not copy it or use it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to > any other person. Thank you for your co-operation.
