On 2/16/20 11:07 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > Can you give us a bit more explanation about why 8238281 broke linux-sparc, > and why your proposal is valid? This doesn't look valid to me: > > (((RegistersForDebugging*)16)->f[0])
Sorry, I didn't see the other thread. -- Andrew Haley (he/him) Java Platform Lead Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com> https://keybase.io/andrewhaley EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
