On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:59:57 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> What I mean is that the amended test will now pass for a URL which has an >> empty fragment but is not a "button". > > I think this change is OK for now. We can make it more restrictive later if > it becomes a problem. I tried to come up with a short explanatory comment, > but couldn't find one I was satisfied with. While maybe uncommon and maybe not necessary, it is not bad HTML (is it?) to have an empty fragment. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6011
