On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 13:16:08 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <i...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Julian Waters has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Syntax > > make/autoconf/configure line 298: > >> 296: exit 1 >> 297: else >> 298: echo "Warning: You are using unsafe autoconf cross-compilation >> flags." > > The autoconf flags are not really unsafe, they are just misleadingly named. > I'd rather see that you restore "legacy" in this output, and the > conf_legacy_crosscompile variable name. Would it be better if I changed that to say the flags are misleading, or if I reverted it back to legacy in that case? (Since that seems to be the primary concern with using them) ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7656
